India grades on a 10-point CGPA, but the banding differs by university —which is why your own institution's official conversion wins over any generic estimate. This converter gives you three reads: the UGC ×9.5 percentage shortcut, a linear proportional map, and a WES-style band, with the caveat that a high Indian CGPA doesn't automatically mean a 4.0.
An Indian CGPA of 8.0 is roughly a 3.3 US GPA.
That clears the common 3.0 floor and is competitive at many US master's programmes. Selective programmes start closer to 3.5, roughly a CGPA of 8.5+. If your university publishes an official CGPA→ table, use it —this is an estimate, not a replacement.
The Indian 10-point scale looks proportional to the US 4.0 —divide by 10, times 4 —and the arithmetic is tempting. But the two scales behave differently at the top. Indian universities set their own banding, some award the top bands generously, and a 9.0 at a strict institution can mean more than a 9.5 at a generous one. Evaluators read the transcript, the institution, and the banding tables together.
First Division typically starts around 60% (≈6.3 ×9.5), and 8.5–0 is strong-to-outstanding territory depending on the university. Banding is institution-specific.
US A/A−territory starts at 90% on many scales. Because Indian top bands are sometimes awarded generously, a high CGPA does not automatically translate to a 4.0.
The three methods below land differently on purpose: the UGC shortcut is the referenceable one in India, WES-style bands are the honest planning read, and the linear map is what naive calculators do —which is why the results can disagree. That disagreement is information, not a bug.
And if you're working from a percentage instead of a CGPA, use the percentage →GPA converter directly.
University Grants Commission guidance: CGPA × 9.5 = percentage. Then map the percentage to US bands using the standard 90/80/70 anchors. Referenceable in India, and the most common shortcut applicants are told.
A common credential-evaluation band read, tuned to how Indian CGPAs typically sit. More forgiving in the middle than a linear map, because a 6.5—.5 CGPA is genuinely solid Indian work.
CGPA × 0.4. Simple and widely used, but it treats both scales as proportionally identical —which they are not. It is harsh on mid-range CGPAs and optimistic nowhere it shouldn't be.
Many Indian universities publish their own CGPA→Percentage conversion. That table always wins over the generic shortcuts here —the ×9.5 factor is guidance, not law, and some institutions effectively use ×10. If your transcript already states a percentage or GPA, report that.
| CGPA (10) | ≈% | Reading | Typical US GPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.0–10 | 85%+ | Outstanding —top band at most institutions | 3.7—.0 |
| 8.5–8.9 | 80%+ | Excellent —strong, competitive | 3.7 |
| 8.0–8.4 | 76%+ | Very good —clears most selective floors | 3.3 |
| 7.0–7.9 | 66%+ | Good —solid, above First Division | 3.0—.3 |
| 6.0–6.9 | 57%+ | First Division boundary | 2.7—.0 |
| < 6.0 | < 57% | Below First Division —check institution policy | < 2.7 |
Percentage equivalents use the UGC ×9.5 factor as guidance; your institution's own table overrides these. 'Typical' is doing real work here —evaluators vary by institution and programme.
Figures last verified August 2026 · Band tables are reconstructions of common practice, not official WES output; always prefer your institution's published table